W3C's Amaya & EW2

Discussion in 'Visual Studio' started by Aristotle, Oct 21, 2008.

Thread Status:
Threads that have been inactive for 5 years or longer are closed to further replies. Please start a new thread.
  1. Are the include files simple HTML files? What about having your managers use Expression Web also to edit these include files?

    Aristotle

    DiscountASP.NET
    www.DiscountASP.NET
     
  2. Thanks for your replay.. Aristotle. We will have only one EW2 license and mangers outside our department and city will be using ?zones? . EW2 will than use the include statements to present compete webpages. I need to find a ?free? XHTML editor for them to us. I thought Amaya would be the best choice because it has the backing of W3C? Something like Sea Monkey will not work because it deals with only HMTL 4.01 and I want to implement XHTML: 1.0 across the entire spectrum?

    Gene</o:p>
     
  3. Has anyone used W3C?s XHTML editor called AMAYA? I am trying to use it with Expression Web 2 as my include option. I have mangers that want to add text/photos dynamically to our website and I thought Amaya is the way to go. Currently, under FrontPage 2003, we use Word 2003 to update pages on the website that I use in the ?include? function of FP2003. It has work great in the past but now as we move into EW2 that option is know longer viable. Word 2003/2007 carries to much baggage and is not XHTML compliant. Thanks, Gene
     
  4. My next question is, what exactly is the problem with using Amaya? Can you also post a sample of what the code in the include files look like? Maybe it's the content that Amaya is having troubles with.

    Aristotle

    DiscountASP.NET
    www.DiscountASP.NET
     
Thread Status:
Threads that have been inactive for 5 years or longer are closed to further replies. Please start a new thread.

Share This Page